It’s not a large or exclusive collection, but I can’t help but be intrigued by the idea behind Double Anal Plugged. I mean it, I’ve seen plenty of double penetration sites, where they put one cock in a slut’s pussy and another simultaneously up her butt snatch, but two dicks in one chick’s asshole seems extreme. Not to mention, a tad tricky to line up both fellows so they can even get their rods in the same orifice at once.

Nevertheless, it apparently can be engineered as proven by the site’s 14 scenes sampled from various DVDs. I actually tried to see, if I could find any info on techniques though. However, I only found a few articles describing what it was. That seemed odd to me since the term seems rather self-explanatory to me. Then I stumbled across a rather surprising article by Robert Jensen on the Dissident Voice (11/14/06).

It asked the question, is a DP (either vaginal, or anal) inherently sexist? The essay is entirely academic, but in my mind, trying to make a science out of an art, as well as a mountain from a molehill. He lists four assumptions, four observations and two possible conclusions. He suggests in the end that men may be interested in DPs because they assume that in everyday life it’s something women don’t want.

He further suggests that most dudes in reality would prefer to avoid close proximity to another man’s genitals and then somehow surmises that since men wouldn’t want to do it that implies that they only do it to be degrading to women. Since the man writing the piece is a journalism professor, perhaps we can forgive his lack of basing conclusions on actual logic and facts.

I cannot dispute that most men and women will not experience any form of double penetration in real-life. However, most people will never win the Super Bowl, so does that make pro-football degrading, since fans enjoy seeing one team beat another? I guess it depends on whether you’re on the winning team then? I can’t understand why everyone tries to use sexual fantasy as measuring stick for actual sexual behavior and beliefs.

I’ll also think that to assume that any sexual practice, you wouldn’t engage in yourself, is inherently unpleasant. Sex in the brain, that’s why some folks actual feel pleasure from receiving pain. I wouldn’t assume that just because something seems extreme that the passive participant isn’t deriving pleasure from the intensity. Nevertheless, I guess when you’ve at least tried more than the missionary position, you learn soon enough, not to judge what you don’t know.